A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between potential neighbours over the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted national consideration adhering to an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times article about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children house. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of recognized people. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying constructed by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, bringing about an encroachment with a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such regions are issue to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially crafted, is in the right place. Their legal team has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has since become emblematic in the intensity in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Collect Visible proof of the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments described, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water all through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the location grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute in the legal timeline.
For the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as made, goes past what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just trying to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert assistance and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods post about René Collier famous the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty distinctive Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded through waist-higher h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other extensive after the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.